Compare Google Tasks vs Microsoft To Do for small team productivity, breaking down their features, strengths, and limitations to help you decide which tool fits your team’s workflow.
Choosing the right task management tool can make or break a small team's ability to stay organized and meet deadlines. For project managers leading small teams, finding a tool that balances simplicity, collaboration, and integration with existing workflows is critical. Google Tasks and Microsoft To Do are two free, accessible tools that integrate deeply with their respective ecosystems, Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, offering distinct approaches to task management, but they cater to different needs.
This article compares Google Tasks vs Microsoft To Do for small team productivity, breaking down their features, strengths, and limitations to help you decide which tool fits your team’s workflow.
Small teams often wear multiple hats, handling everything from client communication to project delivery with limited resources. A good task management tool helps prioritize work, assign responsibilities, and track progress without adding complexity. Google Tasks and Microsoft To Do are lightweight, free tools designed to streamline task management, but their approaches differ. Google Tasks emphasizes simplicity and deep integration with Google Workspace, while Microsoft To Do offers more features and ties closely to the Microsoft 365 ecosystem. Let’s dive into the specifics to see which one better serves small teams in 2025.
Google Tasks is a straightforward task management app built into Google Workspace, making it a natural choice for teams already using Gmail, Google Calendar, or Google Drive. Its minimalist design focuses on ease of use, which can be a big win for small teams who need to get up and running quickly.
Google Tasks shines for teams embedded in Google Workspace. Its integration with Gmail and Calendar means you can manage tasks without leaving your inbox or schedule. For example, if a client emails a project update, you can instantly turn it into a task with a link back to the original email, keeping context intact. The app’s clean interface requires no training, which is ideal for small teams with limited time for onboarding. Since it’s free with any Google account, there’s no cost barrier, making it accessible for startups or freelance teams.
Google Tasks lacks robust team collaboration features. You can’t share task lists or assign tasks to others, which is a significant drawback for project managers coordinating team efforts. For example, if you’re managing a small event planning team, you can’t assign “Book Venue” to one person and “Order Catering” to another within Google Tasks. It’s primarily a personal task manager, so teams must rely on other Google Workspace tools like Docs or Chat for collaboration. Additionally, it lacks advanced features like tags, priority levels, or analytics, which can limit its use for complex projects.
Microsoft To Do, built on the legacy of Wunderlist, is a more feature-heavy task management app integrated with Microsoft 365. It’s designed for both personal and light team collaboration, making it a strong contender for small teams needing more structure than Google Tasks provides.
Microsoft To Do excels in team collaboration. The ability to share lists and assign tasks makes it easier for project managers to delegate work. For example, in a small consulting firm, you can share a “Client Onboarding” list and assign tasks like “Draft Proposal” or “Schedule Kickoff Call” to specific team members. Its integration with Outlook and Teams streamlines workflows for Microsoft 365 users, as tasks created from flagged emails or Teams chats appear instantly in To Do. The “My Day” feature helps team members stay focused, which is critical for small teams with heavy workloads. Like Google Tasks, it’s free with a Microsoft account, keeping costs low.
Microsoft To Do can feel overwhelming for teams who prefer simplicity. The array of features like tags, themes, and multiple list views, may require more setup time than Google Tasks. For a small team with minimal tech experience, this can lead to confusion. Additionally, its reliance on the Microsoft ecosystem means teams using Google Workspace or other tools may find integrations less useful. For example, if your team uses Gmail instead of Outlook, you’ll miss out on the email-to-task functionality. Some advanced features, like recurring tasks, are basic compared to dedicated project management tools like TaskFord, ClickUp, or Asana.
To help project managers choose between Google Tasks and Microsoft To Do, the table below compares them across key criteria for small team productivity in 2025.
Criteria | Google Tasks | Microsoft To Do | Winner |
---|---|---|---|
Ease of Use | Minimal interface with no learning curve. Tasks are added quickly, and drag-and-drop organization is simple. Ideal for teams needing a plug-and-play solution. | Slightly more complex due to additional features like tags and lists, but still user-friendly. Requires some setup time for optimal use. | Google Tasks for speed and simplicity. |
Team Collaboration | No task assignment or list sharing. Better for individual use, with teams relying on Google Docs or Chat for collaboration, adding extra steps. | Supports list sharing and task assignment with real-time syncing, making it ideal for team projects and delegation. | Microsoft To Do for direct collaboration. |
Ecosystem Integration | Excellent for Google Workspace users. Turn emails into tasks and sync due dates with Google Calendar. Limited integration with non-Google tools. | Ideal for Microsoft 365 users, syncing with Outlook, Teams, and Planner. Supports some third-party apps via Zapier for added flexibility. | Depends on ecosystem: Google Tasks for Google users, Microsoft To Do for Microsoft users. |
Features and Customization | Basic features include subtasks, due dates, and reminders. Lacks tags, priority levels, or advanced views, limiting use for complex projects. | Offers tags, recurring tasks, customizable lists, and “My Day” for daily prioritization. More robust for structured workflows. | Microsoft To Do for richer features. |
Cost and Accessibility | Free with any Google account. Available on web, iOS, and Android with no hidden costs or premium tiers. | Free with a Microsoft account. Available on web, Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android with no premium version required. | Tie—both are free and accessible. |
The choice between Google Tasks and Microsoft To Do in 2025 depends on your team’s size, tech stack, and collaboration needs. Here’s a breakdown to guide your decision:
Choose Google Tasks if:
Example: A freelance marketing team of five uses Google Tasks for individual to-do lists, syncing deadlines to Google Calendar and sharing updates via Google Chat.
Choose Microsoft To Do if:
Example: A consulting firm of ten uses Microsoft To Do to assign client deliverables, sync tasks with Outlook, and track shared lists.
In the Google Tasks vs Microsoft To Do debate for 2025, Microsoft To Do leads for small team productivity with its collaboration features and flexibility. Task assignment, list sharing, and Microsoft 365 integration make it ideal for coordinating team efforts. Google Tasks is a strong option for Google Workspace users who value simplicity and quick setup. Assess your team’s tech stack, collaboration needs, and project complexity to decide. With smart workflows, either tool can keep your small team focused and productive.
For more project management tips, see our guide on effective task management for managers.
Making work simpler,
smarter, and more connected
Join our waitlist and be notified first.
Unlock expert insights and stay ahead with TaskFord. Sign up now to receive valuable tips, strategies, and updates directly in your inbox.